IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> MCAS outlines budget studies
Southsider2k12
post Mar 25 2014, 08:12 PM
Post #1


Spends WAY too much time at CBTL
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,421
Joined: 8-December 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 2



PDFs of the proposals and studies are located at the link.

http://www.mcas.k12.in.us/site/default.asp...27&PageID=1

MCAS Outlines Cost-Cutting Measures

Michigan City, IN – March 25, 2014 – Michigan City Area Schools reported on the district’s financial status during a School Board meeting tonight, outlining proposals aimed at helping to close a $3.4 million gap in General Fund budget and revenue projections.


During the Board meeting, MCAS Chief Financial Officer Lance Werner reported that although General Fund operating expenses for the district have declined over time, revenues have decreased dramatically since 2009, when the State of Indiana restructured school financing. Large cuts in State funding, taxpayer funded voucher and charter school programs, and delays in the collection of La Porte County property taxes compounded the problem for MCAS.


Since 2012, MCAS has cut $7.4 million from its annual budget, eliminating more than 140 employees, reducing spending in travel and supplies, reorganizing departments, and achieving efficiencies in areas such as substitute teachers, utilities, and overtime pay. In November, voters rejected a referendum to address the remaining shortfall, necessitating additional significant cutbacks.

MCAS Assistant Superintendent Xavier Botana detailed a proposal that would realize $2.1 million in savings through school consolidation and re-purposing of underutilized facilities. Under the plan, Niemann Elementary and Elston Middle School would be re-purposed. Elementary schools district-wide would serve grades K-6, and Barker and Krueger Middle Schools would serve all students in grades 7 and 8.

Werner outlined additional proposed cuts designed to close the deficit, including administrative staff reductions and furloughs, teacher reductions and furloughs, contract management services for custodial and food service, and support staff reductions. Additional savings is expected due to staff retirements this spring.

MCAS Superintendent Dr. Barbara Eason-Watkins stressed that proposed cuts are aimed at minimizing the impact on students. For example, class size maximums will not increase, and most extra-curriculars and specialized programs will continue. “We must and we will keep our focus on children,” she said. “Our schools have made solid academic progress over the past three years, and we must continue on this path.”

“In November, voters told us that they would not support a tax increase at this time,” said MCAS School Board President Don Dulaney. “I believe the Administration has worked hard to consider all options that allow us to be fiscally responsible to our community, while maintaining a high-quality education for the children and families of Michigan City.”

The MCAS School Board will conduct a public hearing on proposed cuts on Tuesday, April 1 at 6:00 p.m. at the MCAS Administration Building. The hearing will be followed by the Board’s regular monthly meeting. The Board is expected to make a final decision on proposed cuts at its April 22 meeting.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jesse B
post Mar 26 2014, 09:54 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 24-February 10
Member No.: 999



QUOTE(Southsider2k12 @ Mar 25 2014, 09:12 PM) *

PDFs of the proposals and studies are located at the link.

http://www.mcas.k12.in.us/site/default.asp...27&PageID=1

MCAS Outlines Cost-Cutting Measures

Michigan City, IN – March 25, 2014 – Michigan City Area Schools reported on the district’s financial status during a School Board meeting tonight, outlining proposals aimed at helping to close a $3.4 million gap in General Fund budget and revenue projections.


During the Board meeting, MCAS Chief Financial Officer Lance Werner reported that although General Fund operating expenses for the district have declined over time, revenues have decreased dramatically since 2009, when the State of Indiana restructured school financing. Large cuts in State funding, taxpayer funded voucher and charter school programs, and delays in the collection of La Porte County property taxes compounded the problem for MCAS.


Since 2012, MCAS has cut $7.4 million from its annual budget, eliminating more than 140 employees, reducing spending in travel and supplies, reorganizing departments, and achieving efficiencies in areas such as substitute teachers, utilities, and overtime pay. In November, voters rejected a referendum to address the remaining shortfall, necessitating additional significant cutbacks.

MCAS Assistant Superintendent Xavier Botana detailed a proposal that would realize $2.1 million in savings through school consolidation and re-purposing of underutilized facilities. Under the plan, Niemann Elementary and Elston Middle School would be re-purposed. Elementary schools district-wide would serve grades K-6, and Barker and Krueger Middle Schools would serve all students in grades 7 and 8.

Werner outlined additional proposed cuts designed to close the deficit, including administrative staff reductions and furloughs, teacher reductions and furloughs, contract management services for custodial and food service, and support staff reductions. Additional savings is expected due to staff retirements this spring.

MCAS Superintendent Dr. Barbara Eason-Watkins stressed that proposed cuts are aimed at minimizing the impact on students. For example, class size maximums will not increase, and most extra-curriculars and specialized programs will continue. “We must and we will keep our focus on children,” she said. “Our schools have made solid academic progress over the past three years, and we must continue on this path.”

“In November, voters told us that they would not support a tax increase at this time,” said MCAS School Board President Don Dulaney. “I believe the Administration has worked hard to consider all options that allow us to be fiscally responsible to our community, while maintaining a high-quality education for the children and families of Michigan City.”

The MCAS School Board will conduct a public hearing on proposed cuts on Tuesday, April 1 at 6:00 p.m. at the MCAS Administration Building. The hearing will be followed by the Board’s regular monthly meeting. The Board is expected to make a final decision on proposed cuts at its April 22 meeting.


That plan looks encouraging. Only one grade school gets impacted and Elston gets closed. I assume they will put it up for sale or a better option would be to knock it down and keep the property for when there is a need to build a new high school down the road. The current MCHS could become the next Jr. High and you would then close both Barker and Krueger at that time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
taxthedeer
post Mar 27 2014, 02:55 PM
Post #3


Really Comfortable
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,005
Joined: 6-July 09
From: In Front of a computer screen
Member No.: 929



As I think about this school closing/consolidating/grade shifting/job outsourcing scenario the General Motors brand shakeup, for some reason, comes to mind

10 years ago, GM was in dire straits (as they have been many times in their long history)

In an attempt to streamline operations and improve long term profitability, the company dropped the Oldsmobile and Pontiac lines, attempting to consolidate production capabilities, reduce marketing costs, and eliminate duplicate management overhead.

Both Olds and Pontiac had useful life remaining, but the decision was made to kill the brands, thus strengthening the company for long term competition against Ford and the Japanese auto manufacturers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ang
post Apr 1 2014, 11:51 AM
Post #4


Spends WAY too much time at CBTL
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 5,171
Joined: 11-December 06
From: Indiana
Member No.: 10



And now they're in hot water with all the recalls....Shoulda kept Olds and Pontiac....they were good cars!


Signature Bar
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind~Dr. Suess
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MCRogers1974
post Apr 1 2014, 01:44 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 361
Joined: 11-November 09
Member No.: 968



QUOTE(taxthedeer @ Mar 27 2014, 03:55 PM) *

As I think about this school closing/consolidating/grade shifting/job outsourcing scenario the General Motors brand shakeup, for some reason, comes to mind

10 years ago, GM was in dire straits (as they have been many times in their long history)

In an attempt to streamline operations and improve long term profitability, the company dropped the Oldsmobile and Pontiac lines, attempting to consolidate production capabilities, reduce marketing costs, and eliminate duplicate management overhead.

Both Olds and Pontiac had useful life remaining, but the decision was made to kill the brands, thus strengthening the company for long term competition against Ford and the Japanese auto manufacturers.

I agree; many parallelisms here. The “toxic assets” were ultimately unloaded. Another parallelism, Chrysler was suffering from high fixed costs with far too many production facilities to support far too few sales. Reduce the fixed assets to match the sales and the company does much better.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jesse B
post Apr 1 2014, 03:01 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 24-February 10
Member No.: 999



QUOTE(MCRogers1974 @ Apr 1 2014, 02:44 PM) *

I agree; many parallelisms here. The “toxic assets” were ultimately unloaded. Another parallelism, Chrysler was suffering from high fixed costs with far too many production facilities to support far too few sales. Reduce the fixed assets to match the sales and the company does much better.


The government also threw millions towards GM to bail them out on the back of us taxpayers without getting concessions from the UAW.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
taxthedeer
post Apr 3 2014, 08:10 AM
Post #7


Really Comfortable
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,005
Joined: 6-July 09
From: In Front of a computer screen
Member No.: 929



Looking at the PowerPoint it appears that the former Niemann elementary/incoming Krueger 6th graders students are going to be absorbed into Springfield and Lake Hills. Hwy 212 is the boundary, students residing east of 212 will go to Springfield and west of 212 to Lake Hills.

I decided to take a survey, here's what I did:

I have a 4th grader attending Niemann this year and told her that her school is closing and will be attending either Lake Hills or Springfield and since her family resides west of 212 near Tall Timers most likely Lake Hills. On Saturday we decide a short ride together out to 800 N. and 300 W. to show her where she might be going to school for the next two years. Since she told me that she is a City girl and doe not want to go to school out in the country in the middle of the cornfields with all the country kids. She was happy that she is going to stay in the City and go to Lake Hills with most of her most of her little friends at Niemann and the other kids that live out by the beach.

BTW, One observation about Springfield Elementary, their I found baseball facility to be an insult to the sport of baseball. It needs to be razed and returned to the pasture from wence it came.



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
taxthedeer
post Apr 3 2014, 01:32 PM
Post #8


Really Comfortable
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,005
Joined: 6-July 09
From: In Front of a computer screen
Member No.: 929



QUOTE(taxthedeer @ Apr 3 2014, 09:10 AM) *

BTW, One observation about Springfield Elementary, I found their baseball facility to be an insult to the sport of baseball. It needs to be razed and returned to the pasture from wence it came.
I was about to e-mail the superintendent and school board members and complain about the deplorable baseball facility next door to Springfield Elementary school until I looked it up on the beacon site and saw that the property the facility is not owned by the school system but a private individual from Crown Point. There is one building on that property that looks like it's ready to collapse.

http://beacon.schneidercorp.com/Applicatio...228200023000062
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MCRogers1974
post Apr 4 2014, 04:24 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 361
Joined: 11-November 09
Member No.: 968



QUOTE(Jesse B @ Apr 1 2014, 04:01 PM) *

The government also threw millions towards GM to bail them out on the back of us taxpayers without getting concessions from the UAW.

I believe the UAW was forced to accept concessions such as no striking because of wages and benefits, starting wage reduced to $15 per hour, etc. I believe there were a host of concessions, but I might be wrong on this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jesse B
post Apr 4 2014, 05:25 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 24-February 10
Member No.: 999



QUOTE(MCRogers1974 @ Apr 4 2014, 05:24 AM) *

cool.gif--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Jesse B @ Apr 1 2014, 04:01 PM) *</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->
The government also threw millions towards GM to bail them out on the back of us taxpayers without getting concessions from the UAW.

I believe the UAW was forced to accept concessions such as no striking because of wages and benefits, starting wage reduced to $15 per hour, etc. I believe there were a host of concessions, but I might be wrong on this.



I don't think they agreed to a single concession. Definitely not a wage concession.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MCRogers1974
post Apr 4 2014, 06:25 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 361
Joined: 11-November 09
Member No.: 968



QUOTE(Jesse B @ Apr 4 2014, 06:25 AM) *

I don't think they agreed to a single concession. Definitely not a wage concession.

Here is some interesting reading:
Bob King, the next United Auto Workers leader, inherits a union that gave up thousands of jobs and billions in benefits to save the U.S. auto industry. His legacy will rest on how workers are rewarded in the recovery.

King, 63, the nominee of the UAW bloc that has controlled the Detroit-based union since 1946, is slated to succeed two- term President Ron Gettelfinger, 65, in an election tomorrow. The electrician with a law degree, who rose through the ranks in 40 years at the UAW, is set to take over a union that has declined to 355,000 members from 1.5 million in 1979.

The UAW shift coincides with signs of recovery in the industry. General Motors Co. posted a net profit and Chrysler Group LLC made money on an operating basis in the first quarter, less than a year after each emerged from bankruptcy. The union helped convince President Barack Obama to provide an $85 billion taxpayer bailout to those automakers, taking concessions to put their labor costs on par with foreign automakers’ U.S. plants.

“Bob is facing a very, very difficult job because there will be tremendous pressure on him to roll back the concessions,” said Gary Chaison, a labor professor at Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. “He’s got to walk a very fine line to reverse some of what was lost and keep some in place for the promise of a brighter future.”


Photographer: Jeff Kowalsky/Bloomberg
Incoming president of the United Auto Workers union Bob King.
UAW workers have each given up $7,000 to $30,000 in concessions in the last five years, King said last month. The union surrendered raises, bonuses, cost-of-living adjustments and agreed to a two-tier wage system where new hires make about $14 an hour, half what hourly production workers are now paid.

Returning Benefits

As head of the union’s bargaining with Ford Motor Co., King filed a grievance in January after the automaker reinstated raises, 401(k) matches and tuition assistance for salaried workers. Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford has since restored tuition benefits for its 41,000 hourly workers and King is pressing for more.

“UAW members at GM, Ford and Chrysler and throughout the supplier sector have made the sacrifices to keep these companies viable,” King said at a Ford factory in Ypsilanti, Michigan, on May 24. He declined to be interviewed for this story.

UAW labor costs, including wages and benefits, have fallen from $75 an hour to about $55, equal to Toyota Motor Corp.’s U.S. workers. The union has about 113,000 members at Detroit- based GM, Ford and Chrysler, which is based in Auburn Hills, Michigan.

“Bob’s going to make sure our members are not forgotten as these companies rebound,” said UAW director Rory Gamble, who runs King’s former Detroit region and has known him 25 years. “But we’ve got to make sure these companies are viable, so there’s going to be a lot of caution in how we go after this.”

‘Vilified’ Union

Part of the caution will stem from managing the UAW’s public standing. “The current perception of the UAW is one of the lowest of any union in America,” said analyst David Cole of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

A so-called jobs bank in which auto workers received almost full pay while on indefinite layoff “became the flag by which the union was vilified,” Cole said. The union doesn’t receive credit for giving up that jobs bank or other reforms, he said.

“Bob has to get out front and tell the world it’s a different union than it used to be,” Cole said. “Otherwise, it will continue to decay.”

King, the son of a former Ford industrial relations director, has been painted by challengers in the union as going too easy on the company. More than 70 percent of Ford workers rejected additional concessions in November that King endorsed. Ford earned $2.7 billion last year after three years of losses.

Critics in Union

“We can’t just take at face value when these companies cry poverty,” said Gary Walkowicz, a UAW official from King’s home factory in Dearborn, who is making a self-described symbolic run against him for president. “Workers really disagreed with giving up those concessions when Bob King asked them. It showed there’s a disconnect between the membership and the leadership.”

In the next round of contract bargaining in 2011, King has to work toward restoring raises while ensuring the automakers put new models into U.S. factories, said Sean McAlinden, economist at the Center for Automotive Research.

“As the market comes back, the automakers will be adding workers by the thousands,” McAlinden said. “If he holds the line on canceling too many concessions, he’ll get growth. Otherwise, the companies will say, ‘We’ll build up Mexico like you wouldn’t believe.’”

Business Case

King prepares business cases to show managers that hiring more workers at UAW plants can be profitable, said Bernie Ricke, president of UAW Local 600 in Dearborn, who has been at the Ford bargaining table beside King since 2003. “He’s usually very measured, though I’ve seen him pound the table a few times.”

Billionaire investor Wilbur Ross negotiated against King on a contract for his International Automotive Components Group, the world’s largest automotive carpet supplier. King studied IAC’s books and discussed findings with managers before bringing the information to union leaders and rank and file members. The new contract, which cut pay and benefits, passed by 80 percent.

“He’s the prototype for the kind of labor leader who is needed in this modern world,” Ross said in an interview. “His challenge is to preserve manufacturing in the United States at the same time maintaining a standard of living for the worker. It’s a delicate balance.”

King last year approached Ross for help in organizing auto suppliers to support the U.S. cash for clunkers program that funded government subsidies for vehicle trade-ins. They built a coalition of about 50 suppliers across the U.S., and the program eventually helped sell 677,081 cars.

From the Sickbed

King comes to the table with an “intense” work ethic, Gamble said. He’s been seen working two mobile phones at a time in Ann Arbor, where he lives with his wife and three children. (He also has two adult daughters from his first marriage). The night before stomach surgery last year, King called Gamble from his hospital bed at 11:30 p.m. to check on Ford’s plans to transfer workers among plants. After surgery King was right back on the phone, hoarse from a tube in his trachea, Gamble said.

“He could barely talk and I said, ‘Bob you need to get well, man,’” Gamble said. “He was relentless.”

He took a similar approach to his schooling. After studying religion and philosophy at College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, King graduated from the University of Michigan in 1968 with a degree in political science. He did a two-year tour in Korea with the U.S. Army and then went to work for Ford in 1970 at the Rouge factory complex in Dearborn that Henry Ford built in the 1920s. In 1972, King began an electrician apprenticeship while earning a law degree in his off-hours.

Rapid Rise

“While he was still an apprentice, the journeyman skilled tradesmen elected him as their union committeeman, which was unheard of,” Ricke said. “He had to work weekends to finish his apprenticeship.”

Raised Catholic, King draws a link between the labor movement’s mission and social justice. At a UAW convention in California in 1989, he bused reporters to a shanty town in Tijuana, Mexico, to show them the squalor surrounding U.S. companies’ border factories. He took a group of labor leaders to El Salvador in 1990 to monitor union elections.

King’s greatest challenge may be finding a way to build on his earlier efforts to increase the UAW’s ranks. While leading bargaining efforts a decade ago, he helped diversify the membership by organizing graduate students and casino workers.

Johnson Controls

King also led a strike at Johnson Controls Inc. in 2002 where he convinced the supplier to sign a neutrality agreement allowing the union to organize its other U.S. plants. Ford, one of JCI’s largest customers, also said it wouldn’t object to the UAW representing workers at the auto supplier. That set a precedent that enabled the UAW to sign up 25,000 auto parts workers that year, according to labor professor Harley Shaiken of the University of California at Berkeley.

“Bob King leveraged the good relationship the UAW had with Ford into a broader reach with its suppliers,” Shaiken said. “It was innovative and strategic.”

King also reaches out to other unions seeking new strategies for signing up members.

“He actually believes in grassroots organizing, which I think came from our organizing backgrounds,” said Leo Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers union, who consults with King on strategies for boosting membership and considers him soft-spoken but “tough as nails.”

About 350,000 of the 850,000 Steelworkers in the U.S., Canada and the Caribbean work on products that end up in autos.

The UAW can’t keep shrinking and expect to hold the clout that moved a president to rescue GM and Chrysler, Shaiken said.

“He’s facing an unprecedented crisis; the status quo is not tenable,” Shaiken said. “To survive the union has to go forward, and Bob needs to be a transformational leader.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Keith Naughton in Detroit at Knaughton3@bloomberg.net; Jeff Green in Southfield, Michigan, at jgreen16@bloomberg.net

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 05:25 AM

Skin Designed By: neo at www.neonetweb.com