Larkin conviction reinstated |
Larkin conviction reinstated |
Sep 14 2021, 03:57 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Spends WAY too much time at CBTL Group: Admin Posts: 16,421 Joined: 8-December 06 From: Michigan City, IN Member No.: 2 |
https://www.abc57.com/news/indiana-supreme-...hter-conviction
QUOTE The Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated the involuntary manslaughter conviction of John Larkin in the death of his wife Stacy in 2012. Larkin's case has been through the appeals process multiple times since his wife was shot to death in December 2012. In September 2019, Larkin was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. In November 2020, the Indiana Court of Appeals overturned that conviction arguing the jury should not have been instructed on involuntary manslaughter because it was not a lesser or included offense of voluntary manslaughter. The appeals court overturned his conviction and ordered a finding of acquittal. Tuesday the Indiana Supreme Court overturned the appeals court's decision and reinstated Larkin's involuntary manslaughter conviction. The supreme court found involuntary manslaughter was a factually included lesser offense because the state alleged all of the elements of involuntary manslaughter in the charging documents. Involuntary manslaughter requires a battery that "incidentally" kills the victim. Larkin committed battery when he shot his wife and when he pushed his wife, according to the court decision. Another point addressed by the court was the allegation Larkin did not receive fair notice of the involuntary manslaughter charge. The court says Larkin admitted to pushing Stacy with the gun, causing it to discharge. Larkin admitted to the battery that led to Stacy's death - and the state used his admission against him, the supreme court said. |
Dec 22 2021, 06:53 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 28-March 14 Member No.: 1,327 |
So after another hearing via Zoom. The Judge ruled that 9 years was long enough to be a free person has ordered the POS to report to LAPORTE COUNTY JAIL ON FEBUARY 1ST AT NOON. To start serving his sentence of 2 years in which he will only serve 1 year possibly less. While he awaits to see if the US SUPREME COURT will consider his case. I don't see them even possibly considering it but who knows with everything else he has tried to get out of serving time for the crime he committed of taking the life of STACEY !!!
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 09:03 PM |
Skin Designed By: neo at www.neonetweb.com